In Far Cry 5, the map is divided into 3 main regions, but all are unlocked so you can do them in any order, and there's no sense of escalation. That lets them design it to be tougher and more appropriate to how powerful the player is by the time they reach it. It can feel a bit unstructured and directionless.Īt least it and the next two games divide the map into two halves and don't unlock the second half until later. In Far Cry 2 you are given a huge map and spend your time travelling from one side of it to another, and back. The second and later games are more open, which I also like, but I feel the design and story-telling suffers a bit. It also means if you get stuck on one route, you can try something different before getting too frustrated. I find the game very replayable because of there being so many variations. Many of the outdoor maps contain hang-gliders which also provide a lot of alternative routes.
Go up the river and approach the village from inland. Using said patrol boat, go right until you discover a river mouth. Wait a few moments for a patrol boat, liberate it, then use it to cut left past the beach and wood entirely and approach the village by water.
Go left up the hill, then along the beach, then around the headland and approach the village from the landing stage. The obvious: go directly through the wood and approach the village along the path.
It is also quite open in that there are many routes through it. It has some linearity in that it has definite stages, and this helps the story-telling and progression. I'm not so bothered about the mutants, but I did like the general level design, especially the outdoor ones, because of the mix of linearity and openness.įor example, the level that starts on a beach at night, next to a wood, and a village you get the night-goggles from. I started with Far Cry 1 back in the day.
0 kommentar(er)
